If you can tell your story in reverse and it’s not interesting, you don’t have a very good story. I’ve heard this in my head since the moment some film snob (professor) out snobbed me during a break in lecture. We spoke of films and writing and great ways to do it and I had most recently seen Memento and it was fresh in the frontal lobe.
“Memento is a bad… if you reverse it then it’s just a crazy guy helping a killing innocent people. If you can tell your story in reverse and it’s not interesting, you don’t have a very good story.”
– I forget
It completely changed my mind in that instant. I had not yet thought of it this way. I had not gotten to the level of depth of thought that this man had enlightened me with.
This seems to happen mostly with the mystery genre. Some writers believe that if you just seed a possible untruth that can catch you, then nothing else matters. I’m not positive that anything exemplifies this as much as Heavy Rain. Pulling the metaphorical wool over our eyes with the advanced motion capture technology they had pioneered. Interacting with these types of media feel like the mental equivalent of a ruined climax after an extended edging session. They just do not have the payoff that they feel like they’ve earned after the time you’ve spent with it. They never seem apologetic, ashamed, or having been written by anyone with any level of scrutiny.
Basically, what gets you going and then craps out at the end? Makes me wonder…. what other pieces of media, that I’ve experienced, do that?
Maybe I’ll com back here and add to the list. Let’s call it… “Go out with a wet fart list” or GOWAWFL for short.
LOST
Memento
Heavy Rain
St. Elsewhere